🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.